I notice myself feeling hesitant to upvote due to a bunch of unsourced claims. I do still find unsourced claims useful, and I often upvote them, so I’m not sure if this is reasonable; I might just be finding myself disagreeing with claims, but I’d appreciate a version of this with more explicit sourcing and description of idea origins. I have myself upvoted, but I share this comment as a guess as to why the average upvote might not be higher.
edit: actually, after some pondering, I came back and strong upvoted.
I notice myself feeling hesitant to upvote due to a bunch of unsourced claims. I do still find unsourced claims useful, and I often upvote them, so I’m not sure if this is reasonable; I might just be finding myself disagreeing with claims, but I’d appreciate a version of this with more explicit sourcing and description of idea origins. I have myself upvoted, but I share this comment as a guess as to why the average upvote might not be higher.
edit: actually, after some pondering, I came back and strong upvoted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_pluralism
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NnohDYHNnKDtbiMyp/fake-utility-functions
https://www.un-intelligible.org/projects/values/51comm91.php
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2002/06/12/value-pluralism-and-the-challenges-of-freedom/
https://isaiah-berlin.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-09/Bib.196 - Pursuit of the Ideal by Isaiah Berlin_1.pdf
Thanks for your support and the link list. I’ll translate my longer text in a little while.