If the owner is the new user, I’m not sure what real alternatives there are to reviewing the user then.
The user who created the doc is treated as the primary author. I’m not sure offhand how our system treats coauthors who haven’t yet been previously reviewed. My guess is if there is an unreviewed coauthor, the system should ideally get flagged for after-the-fact-review but not be blocking on posting.
If the creating-user wasn’t meaningfully the primary author but just happened to create the post for historical reasons, then I think you can just copy-paste the doc into a new post by either whoever was the primary author, or, if there wasn’t really a primary author, idk, pick whoever else makes marginally more sense to be the document-owner. (You can also message a mod to do this for you but you can self-serve immediately with a pretty simple copy-paste)
If the creating user was the primary author, I think it’s alas just correct for it to go through normal review.
If the owner is the new user, I’m not sure what real alternatives there are to reviewing the user then.
The user who created the doc is treated as the primary author. I’m not sure offhand how our system treats coauthors who haven’t yet been previously reviewed. My guess is if there is an unreviewed coauthor, the system should ideally get flagged for after-the-fact-review but not be blocking on posting.
If the creating-user wasn’t meaningfully the primary author but just happened to create the post for historical reasons, then I think you can just copy-paste the doc into a new post by either whoever was the primary author, or, if there wasn’t really a primary author, idk, pick whoever else makes marginally more sense to be the document-owner. (You can also message a mod to do this for you but you can self-serve immediately with a pretty simple copy-paste)
If the creating user was the primary author, I think it’s alas just correct for it to go through normal review.