Since the other party to the dialog wants to be secretive, i figure giving imagination help decouples the principle matters and that fact in particular matters.
I can think that you could confess to a crime or claim an attack and withhold it for self-incrimination reasons. Then if confessing becomes advantageous validity of it is pretty solid. The confessed crime could be in the past at the moment of writing so it is not predicting anything.
Since the other party to the dialog wants to be secretive, i figure giving imagination help decouples the principle matters and that fact in particular matters.
I can think that you could confess to a crime or claim an attack and withhold it for self-incrimination reasons. Then if confessing becomes advantageous validity of it is pretty solid. The confessed crime could be in the past at the moment of writing so it is not predicting anything.