Huemer’s “standard argument for PC” doesn’t make sense to me. OK, so it is self-defeating to believe not-PC. Does this mean we are justified in believing PC? Why not say that we don’t have a belief on whether PC is true one way or the other?
(Personally I think PC is obvious, but I don’t think it’s possible to prove its obviousness / justifiedness analytically)
Huemer’s “standard argument for PC” doesn’t make sense to me. OK, so it is self-defeating to believe not-PC. Does this mean we are justified in believing PC? Why not say that we don’t have a belief on whether PC is true one way or the other?
(Personally I think PC is obvious, but I don’t think it’s possible to prove its obviousness / justifiedness analytically)