I’m also concerned about fiduciary duty and related mechanisms causing systematic enshittification due to putting pressure on employees to be able to justify their choices to a court.
Also, I don’t know if a judge would see it this way, but internally pushing for safety measures is 100% in shareholder interests because shareholders have an interest in not being killed by misaligned ASI.
I’m also concerned about fiduciary duty and related mechanisms causing systematic enshittification due to putting pressure on employees to be able to justify their choices to a court.
By default, employees don’t have a fiduciary duty to shareholders. The only people with a fiduciary duty are (IIUC) (1) the board of directors and (2) corporate officers who represent the company, such as the CEO. See e.g. https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/business/corporate-fiduciary-duties.html
Also, I don’t know if a judge would see it this way, but internally pushing for safety measures is 100% in shareholder interests because shareholders have an interest in not being killed by misaligned ASI.
Sure. This also isn’t the only mechanism by which going public typically produces enshittification.