Some of this seems unlike anything I’ve heard before (like the Attention-Respect-Security model) and I’m curious to see how this works in practice.
It’s this synthesis that I think is most novel. Part of the reason that I chose the jacuzzi example to lead with is that most psychological frameworks assume some degree of pre-existing respect and security which is not afforded by this context—so solving it requires thinking outside those boxes.
This isn’t totally unique though. “Provocative therapy” is about earning security and respect, and unsurprisingly was developed while working with patients who didn’t choose to be there. PUA stuff is also related in that it’s mostly about earning respect, though security is relatively underemphasized (hence the bad reputation).
What I haven’t seen elsewhere is an explicit framework highlighting when “provocative therapy” is called for vs other things one could conceivably do. In a sense, what I’m aiming to convey is meta to most psychological frameworks.
It’s this synthesis that I think is most novel. Part of the reason that I chose the jacuzzi example to lead with is that most psychological frameworks assume some degree of pre-existing respect and security which is not afforded by this context—so solving it requires thinking outside those boxes.
This isn’t totally unique though. “Provocative therapy” is about earning security and respect, and unsurprisingly was developed while working with patients who didn’t choose to be there. PUA stuff is also related in that it’s mostly about earning respect, though security is relatively underemphasized (hence the bad reputation).
What I haven’t seen elsewhere is an explicit framework highlighting when “provocative therapy” is called for vs other things one could conceivably do. In a sense, what I’m aiming to convey is meta to most psychological frameworks.