Sorry for the lazy criticism. Thanks for your polite reply. And glancing at the page you just linked, I was pleasantly surprised by the 2025 stuff.
I think some disagreements here are probably intractable/illegible; it’s not worthwhile/helpful for me to try to explain my views on all of your regrantors. And I don’t have regrantor suggestions off the top of my head, sorry (fortunately, many of the non-grantmakers best positioned to be regrantors by my lights are already able to fund the lowest-hanging fruit by their lights, in various different ways).
Sorry for the lazy criticism. Thanks for your polite reply. And glancing at the page you just linked, I was pleasantly surprised by the 2025 stuff.
I think some disagreements here are probably intractable/illegible; it’s not worthwhile/helpful for me to try to explain my views on all of your regrantors. And I don’t have regrantor suggestions off the top of my head, sorry (fortunately, many of the non-grantmakers best positioned to be regrantors by my lights are already able to fund the lowest-hanging fruit by their lights, in various different ways).