It’s still outright limited by sensor error. This is a law of physics and well proven.
You can combined observations to extract more fractional bits but there are limits.
Noisy pool like xanatos manipulations of humans or bootstrapping nanoforges without adequate resources are precisely how superintelligence could kill us.
If it isn’t possible because it doesn’t have enough bits of information about biology to make the bioweapon, enough bits about human manipulation to manipulate people into behaving to it’s benefit, or bootstrap a nanoforge, then superintelligence is not so capable it can defeat all of us.
This is right, but a little vacuous without knowing how much sensor error you have, or how much error you can tolerate. I literally said it depends on sensor error, so how much intelligence is limited by matters, rather than asking if there’s a limit.
No...
It’s still outright limited by sensor error. This is a law of physics and well proven.
You can combined observations to extract more fractional bits but there are limits.
Noisy pool like xanatos manipulations of humans or bootstrapping nanoforges without adequate resources are precisely how superintelligence could kill us.
If it isn’t possible because it doesn’t have enough bits of information about biology to make the bioweapon, enough bits about human manipulation to manipulate people into behaving to it’s benefit, or bootstrap a nanoforge, then superintelligence is not so capable it can defeat all of us.
This is right, but a little vacuous without knowing how much sensor error you have, or how much error you can tolerate. I literally said it depends on sensor error, so how much intelligence is limited by matters, rather than asking if there’s a limit.