I disagree with you, but I approve of the habit of taking an idea that won’t fit in a comment and expanding it into a post.
That being said, this post isn’t fleshed out enough for Main- I think it belongs in Discussion. (Alternately, you could add links and other support for all your significant assertions.)
Can you be more specific in your disagreement. Most of what I got from the original post was the suggestion to be very suspicious of humans-evolved-complicated-brain-modules type arguments. I understand if that suspicion isn’t the local consensus, but what’s wrong with it?
I guess. I did not want to focus attack on specific ideas from evolutionary psychology though. But yes I need to add more citations on how DNA affects the connections between neurons.
I disagree with you, but I approve of the habit of taking an idea that won’t fit in a comment and expanding it into a post.
That being said, this post isn’t fleshed out enough for Main- I think it belongs in Discussion. (Alternately, you could add links and other support for all your significant assertions.)
Can you be more specific in your disagreement. Most of what I got from the original post was the suggestion to be very suspicious of humans-evolved-complicated-brain-modules type arguments. I understand if that suspicion isn’t the local consensus, but what’s wrong with it?
Here’s the conversation this sprung from.
I guess. I did not want to focus attack on specific ideas from evolutionary psychology though. But yes I need to add more citations on how DNA affects the connections between neurons.