Without having processed your essay—Please don’t call your concept “sharp right turn.” Not only is “sharp left turn” a non-descriptive name, “sharp right turn” is both non-descriptive and causes learning interference with the existing terminology. People will have a harder time remembering the definition of your concept and they’ll also have a harder time remembering Nate’s concept. EDIT: And I’d guess there are snappier handles for your idea, which seems worth shooting for.
The idea was that sudden deceptive alignment is a general tendency for AIs above some level of intelligence and this will create a period of time when almost all AIs will be deceptively aligned.
May be it is better be called ‘Golden age of deceptive alignment’? or ‘False alignment period’?
I propose the term Jasmine’s alignment, as a reference to the sudden (and fake) alignment of Jasmine in this famous scene of Aladdin (1992), right after Jasmine has realized that there is a possibility of escape:
Without having processed your essay—Please don’t call your concept “sharp right turn.” Not only is “sharp left turn” a non-descriptive name, “sharp right turn” is both non-descriptive and causes learning interference with the existing terminology. People will have a harder time remembering the definition of your concept and they’ll also have a harder time remembering Nate’s concept. EDIT: And I’d guess there are snappier handles for your idea, which seems worth shooting for.
Do we even need a whole new term for this? Why not “Sudden Deceptive Alignment”?
The idea was that sudden deceptive alignment is a general tendency for AIs above some level of intelligence and this will create a period of time when almost all AIs will be deceptively aligned.
May be it is better be called ‘Golden age of deceptive alignment’? or ‘False alignment period’?
I propose the term Jasmine’s alignment, as a reference to the sudden (and fake) alignment of Jasmine in this famous scene of Aladdin (1992), right after Jasmine has realized that there is a possibility of escape:
It is even less self-evident, but thanks for link1