The basic idea of how the FDA process works is that it’s extremely predefined and doesn’t allow the person who wants the approval to cherry pick statistics.
It seems like your approach is to provide more flexibility. Did I get the wrong impression?
I have no idea how the FDA approval process work, so if you tell me that it doesn’t allow any statistics variation then sure, I can only agree and say that the Bayesian method outlined (which not ‘mine’ for any stretch of the word) is more flexible.
The basic idea of how the FDA process works is that it’s extremely predefined and doesn’t allow the person who wants the approval to cherry pick statistics.
It seems like your approach is to provide more flexibility. Did I get the wrong impression?
I have no idea how the FDA approval process work, so if you tell me that it doesn’t allow any statistics variation then sure, I can only agree and say that the Bayesian method outlined (which not ‘mine’ for any stretch of the word) is more flexible.