Perhaps more seriously, the philosophers who got a temporary manpower and influence boost from the invention of math and science should have worked much harder to solve metaphilosophy, while they had the advantage.
This contradicts my position in Some Thoughts on Metaphilosophy. What about that post do you find unconvincing, or what is your own argument for “philosophy being insoluble”?
Perhaps more seriously, the philosophers who got a temporary manpower and influence boost from the invention of math and science should have worked much harder to solve metaphilosophy, while they had the advantage.
It’s quite possible that we have solved metaphilosophy, in the direction of philosophy being insoluble.
This contradicts my position in Some Thoughts on Metaphilosophy. What about that post do you find unconvincing, or what is your own argument for “philosophy being insoluble”?