My guess is this post doesn’t meet our quality bar. In this case I think the post has an interesting-if-true statement but probably not true and doesn’t make much of a case for it.
I wouldn’t object to the post if it were a shortform.
I think I’d object to it as shortform too, though depends on some mod decisions.
This seems fine if we’re allowing for very 101 discussion which doesn’t presume any technical knowledge. If we’re instead aiming to be the discussion place for researchers all of whom who understand enough about how models get trained, then if you have that knowledge the answer to these questions are obvious and not worth posing.
Mod note, in the spirit of our experiment in more involved moderation.
My guess is this post doesn’t meet our quality bar. In this case I think the post has an interesting-if-true statement but probably not true and doesn’t make much of a case for it.
I wouldn’t object to the post if it were a shortform.
I think I’d object to it as shortform too, though depends on some mod decisions.
This seems fine if we’re allowing for very 101 discussion which doesn’t presume any technical knowledge. If we’re instead aiming to be the discussion place for researchers all of whom who understand enough about how models get trained, then if you have that knowledge the answer to these questions are obvious and not worth posing.
Also in terms of evaluation, I also dock this post some points for the ~clickbait title.