You’re right. I was trying to summarize ideas from the book The Cult of Statistical Significance, but that book now looks slightly misleading, and my summary was more misleading.
There are some important ways in which physics rejected significant parts of Fisher’s ideas, but I guess I should describe them more as rejecting dogma than as rejecting p-values.
You’re right. I was trying to summarize ideas from the book The Cult of Statistical Significance, but that book now looks slightly misleading, and my summary was more misleading.
There are some important ways in which physics rejected significant parts of Fisher’s ideas, but I guess I should describe them more as rejecting dogma than as rejecting p-values.