I’m not familiar with Hume’s philosophy, but the idea that “things just are” without being restricted to follow some patterns/laws seems to lose badly in a Bayesian way to theories which accept the laws that exist.
Perhaps, I’ve only heard them vaguely, second-hand, so I’m reluctant to take a position on this yet.
I’m not familiar with Hume’s philosophy, but the idea that “things just are” without being restricted to follow some patterns/laws seems to lose badly in a Bayesian way to theories which accept the laws that exist.
Perhaps, I’ve only heard them vaguely, second-hand, so I’m reluctant to take a position on this yet.