The second difference here is important because it directly contradicts the typical libertarian claim of “if we force people to do things much less than we currently do, that will lead to good consequences.”
Actually that isn’t what Szabo is saying. His point is to contradict the claim of the anarcho-capitalists that “if we never force people to do things, that will lead to good consequences.”
Actually that isn’t what Szabo is saying. His point is to contradict the claim of the anarcho-capitalists that “if we never force people to do things, that will lead to good consequences.”