I mean, it would be perfectly intent-aligned, it carries out its orders to the letter. Only problem is, carrying out its orders involves a takeover. So no, I don’t mean its own goal, but a goal someone gave it.
I guess it’s a bit different in the sense that instrumental convergence states that all goals will lead to power-seeking subgoals. This statement is less strong, it just says that some goals will lead to power-seeking behaviour.
I mean, it would be perfectly intent-aligned, it carries out its orders to the letter. Only problem is, carrying out its orders involves a takeover. So no, I don’t mean its own goal, but a goal someone gave it.
I guess it’s a bit different in the sense that instrumental convergence states that all goals will lead to power-seeking subgoals. This statement is less strong, it just says that some goals will lead to power-seeking behaviour.