Sure. I was simply explaining there are two factions and there are several outcomes that are likely. The thing about the pro AGI side is it offers the opportunity to make an immense amount of money. The terra-dollars get a vote in US politics, obviously Chinese decision making, I am unsure how the eu makes rules but probably there also.
What even funds the anti AGI side? What money is there to be made impeding a technology? Union dues? Individual donations from citizens concerned about imminent existential threats? As a business case it doesn’t pencil in and potentially there could be bipartisan support for massive investment in AI, instead, where neither political party takes the side of the views here on lesswrong. But one party might be in favor of more regulations than the other.
Sure. I was simply explaining there are two factions and there are several outcomes that are likely. The thing about the pro AGI side is it offers the opportunity to make an immense amount of money. The terra-dollars get a vote in US politics, obviously Chinese decision making, I am unsure how the eu makes rules but probably there also.
What even funds the anti AGI side? What money is there to be made impeding a technology? Union dues? Individual donations from citizens concerned about imminent existential threats? As a business case it doesn’t pencil in and potentially there could be bipartisan support for massive investment in AI, instead, where neither political party takes the side of the views here on lesswrong. But one party might be in favor of more regulations than the other.