The Republicans are effectively pro Russia in that with all the US support, Ukraine is holding or marginally winning. Were US support reduced or not increased significantly, the outcome of this war will be the theft of a significant chunk of Ukraine by Russia, about 20 percent of the territory.
I think the framing of the question plays a big role here. If your claim was added as an implication for example, I expect the answer would look very differently. There are other issues as well, where there is bipartisan support, these were just the first two that came readily to my mind.
The issue with AI/AGI research is there are reasons for a very strong, pro AGI group to exist.
Yes, but I do not think Eliezer going on a conservative podcast and talking about the issue will increase the reasons / likelihood.
Sure. I was simply explaining there are two factions and there are several outcomes that are likely. The thing about the pro AGI side is it offers the opportunity to make an immense amount of money. The terra-dollars get a vote in US politics, obviously Chinese decision making, I am unsure how the eu makes rules but probably there also.
What even funds the anti AGI side? What money is there to be made impeding a technology? Union dues? Individual donations from citizens concerned about imminent existential threats? As a business case it doesn’t pencil in and potentially there could be bipartisan support for massive investment in AI, instead, where neither political party takes the side of the views here on lesswrong. But one party might be in favor of more regulations than the other.
I think the framing of the question plays a big role here. If your claim was added as an implication for example, I expect the answer would look very differently. There are other issues as well, where there is bipartisan support, these were just the first two that came readily to my mind.
Yes, but I do not think Eliezer going on a conservative podcast and talking about the issue will increase the reasons / likelihood.
Sure. I was simply explaining there are two factions and there are several outcomes that are likely. The thing about the pro AGI side is it offers the opportunity to make an immense amount of money. The terra-dollars get a vote in US politics, obviously Chinese decision making, I am unsure how the eu makes rules but probably there also.
What even funds the anti AGI side? What money is there to be made impeding a technology? Union dues? Individual donations from citizens concerned about imminent existential threats? As a business case it doesn’t pencil in and potentially there could be bipartisan support for massive investment in AI, instead, where neither political party takes the side of the views here on lesswrong. But one party might be in favor of more regulations than the other.