but there is seemingly no evidence supporting the claim.
There is plenty of evidence! On LW we generally use the word “evidence” in the “bayesian evidence” sense of the term. So “good arguments for X” basically always implies “evidence for X”.
No worries if you are used to using these words in a more “scientific evidence” sense, but it’s actually a pretty important LW norm to think of evidence as something that there exists a lot of.
There is plenty of evidence! On LW we generally use the word “evidence” in the “bayesian evidence” sense of the term. So “good arguments for X” basically always implies “evidence for X”.
No worries if you are used to using these words in a more “scientific evidence” sense, but it’s actually a pretty important LW norm to think of evidence as something that there exists a lot of.