gustaf comments on papetoast’s Shortforms

gustaf 28 Jan 2026 20:44 UTC
2 points
0
Skimmed twitter.search(lesswrong -lesswrong.com -roko -from:grok -grok since:2026-01-01 until:2026-01-28)

negative

https://x.com/fluxtheorist/status/2015642426606600246

[...] LessWrong [...] doesn’t understand second order social consequences even more than usual

https://x.com/repligate/status/2011670780577530024 compares pedantic terminology complaint by peer reviewer of some paper to LW.

https://x.com/kave_rennedy/status/2011131987168542835

At long last, we have built inline reacts into LessWrong, from the classic business book “do not be a micromanager”

https://x.com/Kaustubh102/status/2010703086512378307 first post rejected; claims not written by LLM, but rejection may be because “you did not chat extensively with LLMs to help you generate the ideas.”

positive

During my search, it was hard to ignore the positive comments. So here are some examples of positive comments too.

https://x.com/boazbaraktcs/status/2016403406202806581

P.s. regardless thanks for engaging! And also I cross posted in lesswrong which may have better design

https://x.com/joshycodes/status/2009423714685989320

posted my AI introspection research on lesswrong. a researcher from UK AISI reached out. now we’re collaborating on a paper.

https://x.com/TutorVals/status/2008474014839390312

Any group with a lot of people and without the strictest filtering will have displays of horrendous epistemology, I think one can judge LessWrong by whether popular posts with bad epistemology have it called out in the comments, and I’d say that’s mostly the case

otherwise interesting

https://x.com/RyanPGreenblatt/status/2008623582235242821

if this was LessWrong, would do “scout mindset react”

https://x.com/nearcyan/status/2010945226114994591

FDA is now open to Bayesian statistical approaches. A leap forward! total lesswrong victory

gustaf comments on papetoast’s Shortforms

negative

positive

otherwise interesting