While I mostly agree with the article, I don’t think the Foucalt example given at the start is entirely bad—it just seems like a long-winded warning against confusing the map with the territory (or more specifically against trying to hammer a square territory into a pre-conceived round map).
While I mostly agree with the article, I don’t think the Foucalt example given at the start is entirely bad—it just seems like a long-winded warning against confusing the map with the territory (or more specifically against trying to hammer a square territory into a pre-conceived round map).