Namely, person X benefited from the way event Y turned out; therefore, person X was behind event Y.
Which is exactly what MoR tells us to do to analyze it, is it not?
That’s still not a reason for assuming everyone is running perfect gambit roulettes.
You can say that with a straight face after the last few chapters of plotting?
Yes, I was referring to the theories that Dumbledore sabotaged Snape’s relationship with Lilly so that the boy-who-lived (who hadn’t even been born then) would have the experience of being bullied by his potions master.
Which is exactly what MoR tells us to do to analyze it, is it not?
That’s still not a reason for assuming everyone is running perfect gambit roulettes.
You can say that with a straight face after the last few chapters of plotting?
Yes, I was referring to the theories that Dumbledore sabotaged Snape’s relationship with Lilly so that the boy-who-lived (who hadn’t even been born then) would have the experience of being bullied by his potions master.