Appreciate the clarification! I am worried this is a temporary situation and would change if e.g. a democrat is elected next election. Separately, “include” is a relatively weak statement. Do you have any sense of how much of his concern about AI is driven by foreign governments developing powerful AI systems?
I don’t, sorry! Although, for what it’s worth, in the two conversations I’ve had with him about risks from AI, China didn’t come up.
Edited to add: also, for what it’s worth (and apologies for venturing into explicitly partisan politics), I am personally substantially more worried about AI-enabled authoritarianism under Trump than under most other possible presidents (though my worry definitely doesn’t go away entirely).
I don’t speak for Bores, but I think Eli is correct.
Appreciate the clarification! I am worried this is a temporary situation and would change if e.g. a democrat is elected next election. Separately, “include” is a relatively weak statement. Do you have any sense of how much of his concern about AI is driven by foreign governments developing powerful AI systems?
I don’t, sorry! Although, for what it’s worth, in the two conversations I’ve had with him about risks from AI, China didn’t come up.
Edited to add: also, for what it’s worth (and apologies for venturing into explicitly partisan politics), I am personally substantially more worried about AI-enabled authoritarianism under Trump than under most other possible presidents (though my worry definitely doesn’t go away entirely).