I’m quite interested in the thinking you’ll arrive at over the course of days of pondering this in the background, but in particular I’m very interested in, 1. what you’d expect would have happened in a counterfactual where that service had happened to have provided something functionally identical to lesswrong’s moderation scheme; and, 2. what moderation scheme you would design in order to remove just the harmful parts, without removing the things that you think critical to how it worked as an important crucible of opinion.
I’m quite interested in the thinking you’ll arrive at over the course of days of pondering this in the background, but in particular I’m very interested in, 1. what you’d expect would have happened in a counterfactual where that service had happened to have provided something functionally identical to lesswrong’s moderation scheme; and, 2. what moderation scheme you would design in order to remove just the harmful parts, without removing the things that you think critical to how it worked as an important crucible of opinion.