I’ve been frustrated by the criticism that’s been made of Maple in public
After reading this post, I’m confused. What is wrong with the criticism of Maple in the public?
Your own post seems to argue that Maple is using dangerous religious techniques in a way that traumatizes people in a misguided attempted to prevent AI-caused extinction in a way that obviously wouldn’t work even if their technique was successful (which it’s not).
(I don’t know anything about Maple outside of this post)
MIRI and CFAR were able to say “our research project has failed” and “we fucked up, and also our stuff doesn’t really work that well” respectively
Has Maple done this? It seems important to mention if this was a failure that they learned from or if they’re still doing it.
After reading this post, I’m confused. What is wrong with the criticism of Maple in the public?
Your own post seems to argue that Maple is using dangerous religious techniques in a way that traumatizes people in a misguided attempted to prevent AI-caused extinction in a way that obviously wouldn’t work even if their technique was successful (which it’s not).
(I don’t know anything about Maple outside of this post)
Has Maple done this? It seems important to mention if this was a failure that they learned from or if they’re still doing it.