That wouldn’t fit into our universe (by about 2 metaorders of magnitude). But yes, that simple software would indeed have an equivalent consciousness, with the complexity almost completely moved from the algorithm to the data. There is no other option.
What would it be conscious of, though? Could it feel a headache when you gave it a difficult riddle? I don’t think a look-up table can be conscious of anything except for matching bytes to bytes. Perhaps that corresponds to our experience of recognizing that two geometric forms are identical.
We’re not conscious of internal computational processes at that level of abstraction (like matching bits). We’re conscious of outside inputs, and of the transformations of the state-machine-which-is-us from one state to the next.
Recognizing two geometric forms are identical would correspond to giving whatever output we’d give in reaction to that.
That wouldn’t fit into our universe (by about 2 metaorders of magnitude). But yes, that simple software would indeed have an equivalent consciousness, with the complexity almost completely moved from the algorithm to the data. There is no other option.
What would it be conscious of, though? Could it feel a headache when you gave it a difficult riddle? I don’t think a look-up table can be conscious of anything except for matching bytes to bytes. Perhaps that corresponds to our experience of recognizing that two geometric forms are identical.
We’re not conscious of internal computational processes at that level of abstraction (like matching bits). We’re conscious of outside inputs, and of the transformations of the state-machine-which-is-us from one state to the next.
Recognizing two geometric forms are identical would correspond to giving whatever output we’d give in reaction to that.