They may be sold to Trump as loyal, but that’s probably not even what’s on his mind as long as he’s never seen you to make him look bad. I don’t think disagreeing with Trump on policy will make him see you as disloyal. He doesn’t really care about that.
Saying that the 500 hundred thousand in investment aren’t there after Trump holds an event to announce them is making Trump look back and not a disagreement on policy.
The phrase “ideological loyalty” seems a bit motte and bailey. In politics, you often get into situations where loyalty to other people and loyalty to ideological principles are opposed. When speaking about totalitarian states where people are picked based on loyalty you usually mean that the loyalty is not contingent on ideological principles.
If someone who’s in DOGE driven by the mission of DOGE, they are less likely to do something that helps Elon’s business interests but goes against the mission of DOGE. If they are chosen by what most people mean with loyalty they would help Elon with business interests even if it goes against the mission of DOGE.
If Elon would try to lead DOGE in a way that’s not focused on the mission of cutting waste and increasing efficiency he probably would get a problem with the DOGE team.
Start with sleeping in the office. If every single thing they say about the facts and their reasons for being there were 100 percent true, it’d be dumb to burn yourself out trying to make such massive changes on that kind of work schedule.
Whether something is dumb or not depends on the strategy you pursue. It seems like they chose that strategy because it allowed to make them move very fast and outmaneuver other players. If they would have moved slower, efforts to mobilize forces to inhibit them from accessing the data might have been more effective.
And Marko Elez just had to resign because he wasn’t effective enough in scrubbing his past tweets.
He did delete his account, but given that there are services that show you deleted tweets, there’s not really anything he could have done to scrub all evidence of his past tweets.
I actually would have thought they’d let him skate, but apparently you still can’t get quite that blatant at this point.
I doubt that his tweets were the only reason he resigned. It might be that DOGE communicated to Trump (or Susie Wiles / the head of the treasury) that his team wasn’t seeking write permissions and Marko Elez seeking the write permission was upsetting people.
I do have seen high IQ people (even someone who definitely passed Mensa entry) to post inflammatory right wing content on social media, so I would not say that rules out Marko Elez having a high IQ.
Saying that the 500 hundred thousand in investment aren’t there after Trump holds an event to announce them is making Trump look back and not a disagreement on policy.
The phrase “ideological loyalty” seems a bit motte and bailey. In politics, you often get into situations where loyalty to other people and loyalty to ideological principles are opposed. When speaking about totalitarian states where people are picked based on loyalty you usually mean that the loyalty is not contingent on ideological principles.
If someone who’s in DOGE driven by the mission of DOGE, they are less likely to do something that helps Elon’s business interests but goes against the mission of DOGE. If they are chosen by what most people mean with loyalty they would help Elon with business interests even if it goes against the mission of DOGE.
If Elon would try to lead DOGE in a way that’s not focused on the mission of cutting waste and increasing efficiency he probably would get a problem with the DOGE team.
Whether something is dumb or not depends on the strategy you pursue. It seems like they chose that strategy because it allowed to make them move very fast and outmaneuver other players. If they would have moved slower, efforts to mobilize forces to inhibit them from accessing the data might have been more effective.
He did delete his account, but given that there are services that show you deleted tweets, there’s not really anything he could have done to scrub all evidence of his past tweets.
I doubt that his tweets were the only reason he resigned. It might be that DOGE communicated to Trump (or Susie Wiles / the head of the treasury) that his team wasn’t seeking write permissions and Marko Elez seeking the write permission was upsetting people.
I do have seen high IQ people (even someone who definitely passed Mensa entry) to post inflammatory right wing content on social media, so I would not say that rules out Marko Elez having a high IQ.