To them, that’s what Safety™ means. It would be like if they said about you “Oh, just because it’s been mathematically proven that the AGI will act in humanity’s best interests, you’ll support its development even though it occasionally, I dunno, says slurs or something.”
Headline (paraphrased): “Movie stars support anti-AI campaign”
The actual campaign: “It is possible to have it all. We can have advanced, rapidly developing AI and ensure creators’ rights are respected.”
That’s not anti-AI.
That’s “please pay us and we will support capabilities advancement; safety be damned”.
Like, if you believe IABIED, then no, we can’t have rapidly developing AI and ensure anyone’s rights are respected.
To them, that’s what Safety™ means. It would be like if they said about you “Oh, just because it’s been mathematically proven that the AGI will act in humanity’s best interests, you’ll support its development even though it occasionally, I dunno, says slurs or something.”
Well, no, that’s not what they’re saying. They’re making a different set of mistakes from those mistakes.