What someone spends time writing is an important signal. More generally, what someone is interested in—and spend time on—is one of the most powerful signals as to what they’ll do in future.
“Real views” is a bit slippery of a concept. But I strongly predict that most of their outputs in future will look like it’s taken “AI will happen and we need to be there” as a primitive, and few will look like they’re asking themselves “Should AI happen?”. Because the latter question is just not a thought that interests them.
I don’t think this kind of relative-length-based analysis provides any more than a trivial amount of evidence about their real views.
What someone spends time writing is an important signal. More generally, what someone is interested in—and spend time on—is one of the most powerful signals as to what they’ll do in future.
“Real views” is a bit slippery of a concept. But I strongly predict that most of their outputs in future will look like it’s taken “AI will happen and we need to be there” as a primitive, and few will look like they’re asking themselves “Should AI happen?”. Because the latter question is just not a thought that interests them.