It seems both unnecessary and bad form to cite a particular person’s name in the title of this post, which appears to mostly not be about him at all, but rather a concept that he wrote about.
Oh! I’ve changed the title to “Duncan Sabien’s Colour Wheel applied to Politics”. Does that work? Or is there some reason his name should be removed completely?
I think that’s a big improvement, but also it’s not really his color wheel, He didn’t invent it. It’s the Magic the Gathering color wheel. Or if you must attribute it to someone, I believe (don’t quote me) it was the invention of Richard Garfield, who is the creator of Magic the Gathering.
I mean, the color wheel is from magic: the gathering, not Duncan Sabien. He just wrote a particular (interesting) take on it. My impression that Mark Rosewater has had the most influence on shaping the philosophy (or at least communicating it).
It seems both unnecessary and bad form to cite a particular person’s name in the title of this post, which appears to mostly not be about him at all, but rather a concept that he wrote about.
Oh! I’ve changed the title to “Duncan Sabien’s Colour Wheel applied to Politics”. Does that work? Or is there some reason his name should be removed completely?
I think that’s a big improvement, but also it’s not really his color wheel, He didn’t invent it. It’s the Magic the Gathering color wheel. Or if you must attribute it to someone, I believe (don’t quote me) it was the invention of Richard Garfield, who is the creator of Magic the Gathering.
Yes, I updated it to “MtG colour wheel applied to politics”
I mean, the color wheel is from magic: the gathering, not Duncan Sabien. He just wrote a particular (interesting) take on it. My impression that Mark Rosewater has had the most influence on shaping the philosophy (or at least communicating it).
Oh. This is actually useful, I didn’t realise this. I’ll update the title.
Update: The title is now “MtG Colour Wheel applied to Politics”