This post reads to me as a significantly improved version of the earlier “Here’s the exit”, in that this one makes a similar point but seems to have taken the criticisms of that post to heart and seems a lot more epistemically reasonable. And I want to just explicitly name that and say that I appreciate it.
(Also I agree with a lot in the post, though some of the points raised in the responses about 2028 maybe being a poor choice for this also sound valid.)
This post reads to me as a significantly improved version of the earlier “Here’s the exit”, in that this one makes a similar point but seems to have taken the criticisms of that post to heart and seems a lot more epistemically reasonable. And I want to just explicitly name that and say that I appreciate it.
Thanks for noticing and mentioning it. I’m trying. It’s nice to have some “Yes, this” type feedback. It’s helpful (and also touching).
This post reads to me as a significantly improved version of the earlier “Here’s the exit”, in that this one makes a similar point but seems to have taken the criticisms of that post to heart and seems a lot more epistemically reasonable. And I want to just explicitly name that and say that I appreciate it.
(Also I agree with a lot in the post, though some of the points raised in the responses about 2028 maybe being a poor choice for this also sound valid.)
Thanks for noticing and mentioning it. I’m trying. It’s nice to have some “Yes, this” type feedback. It’s helpful (and also touching).