here he argues directly against “To be able to determine the future in a way that is itself determined falls short of being able to steer to a future of your choosing.”
Not really, because he is only saying , in typical compatiblist fashion, that you can bring about future in accordance with your desires …which are determined. There is still no unpredictable turning point when you make a choice … and therefore no steering to one of a number of physically possible futures...just a bunch of clockwork that’s all inevitable.
Not really, because he is only saying , in typical compatiblist fashion, that you can bring about future in accordance with your desires …which are determined. There is still no unpredictable turning point when you make a choice … and therefore no steering to one of a number of physically possible futures...just a bunch of clockwork that’s all inevitable.