At least in my mind, the processes that generate beliefs like “my keys are in my left pocket” are not perfectly reliable—at least once, I have thought my keys were in my left pocket when in fact I left them on the dresser.
So #3 is demonstrably false for me; on this account, I don’t know where my keys are.
Which is perfectly internally consistent, though it doesn’t match up with the colloquial usage of “to know,” which seems to indicate that the speaker’s confidence in p is above some threshold.
There’s nothing wrong with having precisely defined terms of art, in epistemology or any other field. But it can lead to confusion when colloquial words are repurposed in this way.
At least in my mind, the processes that generate beliefs like “my keys are in my left pocket” are not perfectly reliable—at least once, I have thought my keys were in my left pocket when in fact I left them on the dresser.
So #3 is demonstrably false for me; on this account, I don’t know where my keys are.
Which is perfectly internally consistent, though it doesn’t match up with the colloquial usage of “to know,” which seems to indicate that the speaker’s confidence in p is above some threshold.
There’s nothing wrong with having precisely defined terms of art, in epistemology or any other field. But it can lead to confusion when colloquial words are repurposed in this way.
Add “with high probability” everywhere.