Hi Oliver. Do you have any thoughts on how to decrease uncertainty about welfare comparisons across species? I would agree it is super large. For sentience-adjusted welfare ranges proportional to “individual number of neurons”^“exponent”, and “exponent” from 0 to 2, which covers the best guesses that I consider reasonable, the sentience-adjusted welfare range of shrimps is 10^-12 to 1 times that of humans, whereas it is tentatively 8.0 % in Bob Fischer’s book about comparing welfare across species.
Hi Oliver. Do you have any thoughts on how to decrease uncertainty about welfare comparisons across species? I would agree it is super large. For sentience-adjusted welfare ranges proportional to “individual number of neurons”^“exponent”, and “exponent” from 0 to 2, which covers the best guesses that I consider reasonable, the sentience-adjusted welfare range of shrimps is 10^-12 to 1 times that of humans, whereas it is tentatively 8.0 % in Bob Fischer’s book about comparing welfare across species.