Thanks for response; my personal concerns[1] would somewhat be alleviated, without any technocal changes, by:
Lightcone Infrastructure explicitly promising not to look at private messages unless a counterparty agrees to that (e.g., becasue a counterparty reports spam);
Everyone with such access explicitly promising to tell others at Lightcone Infrastructure when they access any private content (DMs, drafts).
Clarifying in the first case: If Bob signs up and DMs 20 users, and one reports spam, are you saying that we can only check his DM, or that at this time we can then check a few others (if we wish to)?
Thanks for response; my personal concerns[1] would somewhat be alleviated, without any technocal changes, by:
Lightcone Infrastructure explicitly promising not to look at private messages unless a counterparty agrees to that (e.g., becasue a counterparty reports spam);
Everyone with such access explicitly promising to tell others at Lightcone Infrastructure when they access any private content (DMs, drafts).
Talking to a friend about an incident made me lose trust in LW’s privacy unless it explicitly promises that privacy.
Second one seems reasonable.
Clarifying in the first case: If Bob signs up and DMs 20 users, and one reports spam, are you saying that we can only check his DM, or that at this time we can then check a few others (if we wish to)?