I’m confused about why you’re pointing to Anthropic in particular here. Are they being overoptimistic in a way that other scaling labs are not, in your view?
Unlike other labs, Anthropic is full of people who care and might leave capabilities work or push for the leadership to be better. It’s a tricky place to be in: if you’re responsible enough, you’ll hear more criticism than less responsible actors, because criticism can still change what you’re doing.
Other labs are much less responsible, to be clear. There’s it a lot (I think) my words here can do about that, though.
Got it. It might be worth adding something like that to the post, which in my opinion reads as if it’s singling out Anthropic as especially deserving of criticism.
I’m confused about why you’re pointing to Anthropic in particular here. Are they being overoptimistic in a way that other scaling labs are not, in your view?
Unlike other labs, Anthropic is full of people who care and might leave capabilities work or push for the leadership to be better. It’s a tricky place to be in: if you’re responsible enough, you’ll hear more criticism than less responsible actors, because criticism can still change what you’re doing.
Other labs are much less responsible, to be clear. There’s it a lot (I think) my words here can do about that, though.
Got it. It might be worth adding something like that to the post, which in my opinion reads as if it’s singling out Anthropic as especially deserving of criticism.