Thanks, that’s useful. I’d heard of some other reconsolidation-fans read Burns’s new book and also highlight the “what’s good about this” aspect of it as CBT “also coming around” to the “positive purpose” idea. So then when I thought I saw it in this post as well, I assumed that to be correct. Especially since that would have helped explain why TEAM is so effective.
Though interestingly this makes me somewhat more interested in TEAM, since it’s obviously doing something different from what I already know, rather than just confirming my previous prejudices without adding new information. :-)
Thanks, that’s useful. I’d heard of some other reconsolidation-fans read Burns’s new book and also highlight the “what’s good about this” aspect of it as CBT “also coming around” to the “positive purpose” idea. So then when I thought I saw it in this post as well, I assumed that to be correct. Especially since that would have helped explain why TEAM is so effective.
Though interestingly this makes me somewhat more interested in TEAM, since it’s obviously doing something different from what I already know, rather than just confirming my previous prejudices without adding new information. :-)