It seems inconsistent to be denying moral realism and then making claims about what sort of language we should be using.
This is a good point. I think I need to do another post on “what you can still say once you’ve abandoned realism”.
Doesn’t the simple statement that “you can still agree on some things” pretty much sum it up?
Right—in this case he is claiming that, by our own subjective criteria, each one of us would benefit if we all used less realist language.
This is a good point. I think I need to do another post on “what you can still say once you’ve abandoned realism”.
Doesn’t the simple statement that “you can still agree on some things” pretty much sum it up?
Right—in this case he is claiming that, by our own subjective criteria, each one of us would benefit if we all used less realist language.