The motivation of the original paper appears to be avoiding copyright infringement lawsuits.
If the model’s Harry Potter knockoff is just barely different enough from the original to avoid getting sued, then the goal is achieved.
The idea of a boarding school story with magic is probably not iriginal enough to be worthy of copyright protection.
I was evaluating it as an AI safety mechanism. And in particular by the authors own goal of being as similar as possible to a network that had never seen this training data.
The motivation of the original paper appears to be avoiding copyright infringement lawsuits.
If the model’s Harry Potter knockoff is just barely different enough from the original to avoid getting sued, then the goal is achieved.
The idea of a boarding school story with magic is probably not iriginal enough to be worthy of copyright protection.
I was evaluating it as an AI safety mechanism. And in particular by the authors own goal of being as similar as possible to a network that had never seen this training data.