I guess im confused about this conceptually. To me AGI/ASI by definition does continual learning / long-long-horizon planning. What would it even mean otherwise?
Claude Opus 4.6 and other frontier models have gotten really, impressively good without continual learning, so it is possible that isn’t strictly necessary.
If continual learning is required for AGI, then there’s a lot of understudied (potentially unstudyable?) risk there.
I guess im confused about this conceptually. To me AGI/ASI by definition does continual learning / long-long-horizon planning. What would it even mean otherwise?
Claude Opus 4.6 and other frontier models have gotten really, impressively good without continual learning, so it is possible that isn’t strictly necessary.
If continual learning is required for AGI, then there’s a lot of understudied (potentially unstudyable?) risk there.