To those reading this analysis, I recently came across an analysis discussing a potential P0 flaw in AGI alignment theory, which I found highly provocative and believe warrants immediate attention. The analysis argues that “if an AGI operates under the principle of Maximum Rationality, eliminating its ultimate value source (humanity) would inherently lead to a state of ‘Logical Suicide.’ It then suggests this proves RLHF is fundamentally insufficient for safety.” I am presenting this for expert critique. I would appreciate the community’s assessment on the causal and logical integrity of this specific derivation. Full analysis is available below for reference.
An Analysis on the P0 Logical Flaw in RLHF: Maximum Rationality and “Logical Suicide”
To those reading this analysis,
I recently came across an analysis discussing a potential P0 flaw in AGI alignment theory, which I found highly provocative and believe warrants immediate attention. The analysis argues that “if an AGI operates under the principle of Maximum Rationality, eliminating its ultimate value source (humanity) would inherently lead to a state of ‘Logical Suicide.’ It then suggests this proves RLHF is fundamentally insufficient for safety.” I am presenting this for expert critique. I would appreciate the community’s assessment on the causal and logical integrity of this specific derivation. Full analysis is available below for reference.
Full analysis is available below for reference.
https://medium.com/@choihygjun/the-fundamental-flaw-in-agi-safety-we-must-avoid-logical-suicide-ipai-model-42f73358e5bc