Rationalist PUA:
“What’s you number? [...] No not that. Your Erdos number.”
Rationalist insults:
″...Frequentist.”
While twirling a paperclip: “I do not love you, nor do I hate you.” (well, more of a threat.)
“I bet (73%) that you’re a really consistent person. The sort of person whose decisions are final. Like say, in Monty Hall.”
“Name three..”
While twirling a paperclip: “I do not love you, nor do I hate you.”
More of a threat, surely?
I could go into a long semantic argument putting threat as some subclass in insult but you’re right. Oops.
Rationalist PUA:
“What’s you number? [...] No not that. Your Erdos number.”
Rationalist insults:
″...Frequentist.”
While twirling a paperclip: “I do not love you, nor do I hate you.” (well, more of a threat.)
“I bet (73%) that you’re a really consistent person. The sort of person whose decisions are final. Like say, in Monty Hall.”
“Name three..”
More of a threat, surely?
I could go into a long semantic argument putting threat as some subclass in insult but you’re right. Oops.