it doesn’t follow that all statements in terms of those definitions are false.
Indeed. I don’t think anyone said anything about any statements being false though?
Also, I’m aware that Chris is an intentional strawman, so took a more charitable view of him, to compensate. The point is that Betsy’s perspective is not without issues, as I assume OP to believe.
Even if humans are using arbitrary definitions. it doesn’t follow that all statements in terms of those definitions are false.
Indeed. I don’t think anyone said anything about any statements being false though?
Also, I’m aware that Chris is an intentional strawman, so took a more charitable view of him, to compensate. The point is that Betsy’s perspective is not without issues, as I assume OP to believe.
“There indeed are no planets”