560M is not from the paper, it is from the post. The paper has graph with births per year stabilizing at around 5M, which can correspond to different population sizes depending on child mortality, but all of them are unrealistically low.
This would leave us with a global population around 560M.
Sorry, I was just trying to say that the paper says that in 300-600 years we’d have ~560M people, not that it says that we’d get to 560M and level out.
Where do you see the paper predicting stabilization at 560M?
560M is not from the paper, it is from the post. The paper has graph with births per year stabilizing at around 5M, which can correspond to different population sizes depending on child mortality, but all of them are unrealistically low.
Sorry, I was just trying to say that the paper says that in 300-600 years we’d have ~560M people, not that it says that we’d get to 560M and level out.