@1a3ornwould you be interested in discussing this stuff on a call sometime? I disagree with many of your takes but I generally find you to be a thoughtful person who wants to figure out what’s true, and I’d be pretty curious to know what kind of research you would be happy with. (not promising we’ll do that, but I would be down to hear you out). Also, I could imagine an adversarial collaboration being quite interesting.
(Small suggestion of the call being recorded and transcript linked from a quick take or comment. I’m happy to pay for rev.com to make a transcription.)
(I’m going to take the weekend off but plan to reply afterwords. I appreciate your engagement here.)
@1a3orn would you be interested in discussing this stuff on a call sometime? I disagree with many of your takes but I generally find you to be a thoughtful person who wants to figure out what’s true, and I’d be pretty curious to know what kind of research you would be happy with. (not promising we’ll do that, but I would be down to hear you out). Also, I could imagine an adversarial collaboration being quite interesting.
(Small suggestion of the call being recorded and transcript linked from a quick take or comment. I’m happy to pay for rev.com to make a transcription.)