My opinion is that it’s more beneficial to have relevant ethical discussions in one place. What is your motivation for having a separate blog rather than making top level posts on Less Wrong in the first place?
As for the actual content—my concern with meta-ethics is that the average person is unlikely to actually contribute something new and useful. So basically it comes down to “have the experts come up with anything definitive yet? If not, lemme know when they do.” Until then, I do think people should settle on some form of Normative Ethics so they at least have a means to resolve internal disputes.
My opinion is that it’s more beneficial to have relevant ethical discussions in one place. What is your motivation for having a separate blog rather than making top level posts on Less Wrong in the first place?
As for the actual content—my concern with meta-ethics is that the average person is unlikely to actually contribute something new and useful. So basically it comes down to “have the experts come up with anything definitive yet? If not, lemme know when they do.” Until then, I do think people should settle on some form of Normative Ethics so they at least have a means to resolve internal disputes.
I’m maintaining a separate blog primarily to establish some vague sort of credibility for myself, and also to satisfy my ego.
Heh. Fair enough.