I’ve seen people on Twitter explicitly advocate for acceleration on the basis that it speeds up max-entropy. I don’t know if it’s impossible to reach such people, but I don’t think optimizing communication to that end is worth it.
I think it’s plausibly worth trying to communicate things in ways that are legible to people who aren’t already adversarially posed to the entire effort; the costs are smaller and the benefits are larger. I think trying to flip e/acc randos is, if not hopeless, not a great use of cycles.
sure, but don’t help them figure out which capabilities work when it’s avoidable to make a point, even if those are fairly obvious—that’s really all I’m saying.
I’ve seen people on Twitter explicitly advocate for acceleration on the basis that it speeds up max-entropy. I don’t know if it’s impossible to reach such people, but I don’t think optimizing communication to that end is worth it.
I think it’s plausibly worth trying to communicate things in ways that are legible to people who aren’t already adversarially posed to the entire effort; the costs are smaller and the benefits are larger. I think trying to flip e/acc randos is, if not hopeless, not a great use of cycles.
sure, but don’t help them figure out which capabilities work when it’s avoidable to make a point, even if those are fairly obvious—that’s really all I’m saying.