The $100k threshold of the costs of a Super-Phone would imply that the cheapest phone should cost between $100 and $1k. However, the cost of the most primitive known phones is between $10 and $100, potentially implying that the most luxurious phones should cost $10k instead of $100k. Additionally, we had Jon Haidt’s allies recommend basic phones to kids (and to adults?) due to potential problems caused by smart phones.
I don’t think that the ratio from most expensive to least expensive is a constant as you are using it, I’d be very surprised if this ratio is the same for various different goods and services.
The $100k threshold of the costs of a Super-Phone would imply that the cheapest phone should cost between $100 and $1k. However, the cost of the most primitive known phones is between $10 and $100, potentially implying that the most luxurious phones should cost $10k instead of $100k. Additionally, we had Jon Haidt’s allies recommend basic phones to kids (and to adults?) due to potential problems caused by smart phones.
I don’t think that the ratio from most expensive to least expensive is a constant as you are using it, I’d be very surprised if this ratio is the same for various different goods and services.