Instead they worked hard, and collected a coalition, and built an international nuclear anti-proliferation regime.
I think it’s important to note that this happened after two catastrophes—Hiroshima and the Cuban Missile Crisis. I think the overall sentiment of this article is probably correct, and law is necessary. The question is how it can come about. The ‘working hard’ bit here deserves more elaboration, especially regarding the necessary conditions for hard work to actually pay off. Is a catastrophe required for AI to get its non-proliferation regime?
I think it’s important to note that this happened after two catastrophes—Hiroshima and the Cuban Missile Crisis. I think the overall sentiment of this article is probably correct, and law is necessary. The question is how it can come about. The ‘working hard’ bit here deserves more elaboration, especially regarding the necessary conditions for hard work to actually pay off. Is a catastrophe required for AI to get its non-proliferation regime?